Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
Tim Peierls
tim at peierls.net
Sat Nov 3 14:17:05 PDT 2012
[forgot to reply all]
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> I think the opposite is better -- let them each have a unique name.
> Otherwise, we can run into overload problems where we want one Sam to
> implement or extend another -- which I don't think is dumb.
>
It's not dumb, it's just that I have yet to encounter a need for it in
practice.
Having the same name is much easier on the brain. This stuff is asking a
lot of people already; here's one way to reduce the pain.
--tim
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers
mailing list