Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces

Brian Goetz brian.goetz at oracle.com
Sun Nov 4 06:09:32 PST 2012


IMO, dramatically worse, yes. 

On Nov 4, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> For all you Procedure-lovers out there -- how do you feel about the specialized types
> 
>   IntProcedure
>   LongProcedure
> etc?
> 
> I think they're awful.
> 
> Worse than IntBlock and LongBlock? I'd say a little better, actually. I have an immediate sense of what IntProcedure means, but I have no intuition about IntBlock.
> 
>  
> But, this naming rule serves us pretty well in all the other cases.
> 
> It seems reasonable here, too. I expect the specialized types to be a bit ugly, but the ugliness arises from the need for specialized types, not from the choice of stem.
> 
> --tim
> 



More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list