Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
Brian Goetz
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Sun Nov 4 06:09:32 PST 2012
IMO, dramatically worse, yes.
On Nov 4, 2012, at 9:07 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> For all you Procedure-lovers out there -- how do you feel about the specialized types
>
> IntProcedure
> LongProcedure
> etc?
>
> I think they're awful.
>
> Worse than IntBlock and LongBlock? I'd say a little better, actually. I have an immediate sense of what IntProcedure means, but I have no intuition about IntBlock.
>
>
> But, this naming rule serves us pretty well in all the other cases.
>
> It seems reasonable here, too. I expect the specialized types to be a bit ugly, but the ugliness arises from the need for specialized types, not from the choice of stem.
>
> --tim
>
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers
mailing list