CompletableFuture

[Doug Lea]

On 11/27/12 17:01, Remi Forax wrote:

>>     /**
>>      * Performs the given action with the result of this
>>      * CompletableFuture if/when it completes normally.
>>      *
>>      * @return this CompletableFuture, for convenience
>>      */
>>     public CompletableFuture<T> then(Block<? super T> action);
>
> The result should be a Completable<?> not a CompletableFuture<T>, right ?

The void completion methods don't return new CompletableFuture (no need)
but just "return this" to be nice to fluency fans.

Also, as a couple of people now have noticed. The name "Block"
here looks especially weird/distracting/wrong.

Brian, are we really keeping the name "Block" even though
no responses on this list a few weeks ago were in favor if it?

-Doug