FlatMapper

[Raab, Donald]

Is there anything wrong with flatMapInto?  Apologies if this was already covered and dismissed.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lambda-libs-spec-experts-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:lambda-
> libs-spec-experts-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Brian Goetz
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:36 AM
> To: Kevin Bourrillion
> Cc: lambda-libs-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: FlatMapper
> 
> Is mapInto better than flattenInto?  Still trivial to change at this
> point.
> 
> On 2/21/2013 11:33 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> > Tardy, but:  the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with
> > "mapInto".  Sure, you can map /multiple, /but that fact just didn't
> > seem overly necessary to force into the name.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
> > <mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     flattenInto gets my vote
> >
> >     On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr
> >     <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
> >
> >         On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> >
> >             flattenInto seems the best so far.
> >
> >
> >         +1
> >
> >         Rémi
> >
> >
> >             On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> >
> >                 On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax
> >                 <forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>
> >                 <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-
> mlv.fr>>>
> >                 wrote:
> >
> >                      mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me,
> >                 mapAndFlat ?
> >
> >
> >                 No, has to be a verb.
> >
> >                 I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping
> >                 part to be implied
> >                 by the type name.
> >
> >                 --tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. |kevinb at google.com
> > <mailto:kevinb at google.com>