FJP.CommonPool and VM shutdown

[Doug Lea]

Oh, just to be extra-clear:

On 01/01/13 11:55, Doug Lea wrote:
> Not really. It was always the case that if you wanted to wait out
> a submitted async FJ task from main() (to any FJP), you had
> to awaitTermination.

That is, some submitted task that you don't know about
and so cannot join.

> Only those few people who do this (mainly
> Martin Buchholz and me, writing test code!) ever had to think
> about it. Now there is another uncommon case along these lines,
> with the implicit common pool, but it can now be programmed in
> exactly the same way.
>
> -Doug
>