mappedTo -> join?

[Michael Nascimento]

Do these Reducers include the opposite, i.e., a Map<T, Person>? This
is a most common business operations in the code I've been trying to
migrate to lambda use.

Regards,
Michael



On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 06:12 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>
>> One of the reducers we've got takes a Stream<T> and a function T->U and
>> creates a Map<T,U>.  Currently we call this "mappedTo".  Should this be
>> called "join" instead?  Or mapJoin?
>>
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mappedTo(Person::getAge)));
>> vs
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(join(Person::getAge)));
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mapJoin(Person::getAge)));
>
>
> or just toMap,
> Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(Reducer.toMap(Person::getAge)));
>
> Rémi
>