Function type naming conventions

[Brian Goetz]

OK, I've completed:

  - {Int,Long,Double}Function -> ToXxxFunction
  - {Int,Long,Double}BiFunction -> ToXxxBiFunction
  - Obj{Int,Long,Double}Function -> XxxFunction

The remaining weird ones are:

   ObjIntBiBlock  (T, int) -> void

These could stay ObjIntBiBlock, or, with the "arity unnecessary if all 
args are specialized" rule tweak, could become:

   ObjIntBlock

Thoughts?

On 1/24/2013 2:03 PM, Joe Bowbeer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com
> <mailto:daniel.smith at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Let me propose a slightly different convention: if the base type is
>     parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To"
>     prefix is mandatory.  If not, "To" is not used.
>
>
> This works for me if the base name is descriptive enough.
>   IntSupplier, IntConsumer, even IntBlock (now that I know what a Block is).
>
>     —Dan
>
>