Function type naming conventions

[Kevin Bourrillion]

Does anyone have a complete and current taxonomy of where exactly we've
ended up with all this (leaving out all the history of how we got here)?


On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 ObjIntBlock (or a more descriptive "Block" name if one is selected)
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
> Works well in conjunction with Dan Smith's suggestion ('if the base type
> is parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is
> mandatory.  If not, "To" is not used.'), omitting To and Bi where they
> aren't needed.
>
> --tim
>



-- 
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com