MumbleCloseable

[Doug Lea]

On 06/26/13 16:36, Brian Goetz wrote:
> What do we think of this name?
>
>    MayHoldCloseableResource
>

The royal We thinks: fine :-)
If we can't have a stunningly great name, we can at least have
a stunningly clear one.

-Doug


> Shortenings might include:
>
>    MayHoldResource
>    MayHoldCloseable
>
>
>
> On 6/25/2013 11:37 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> Actually,
>>
>> MayHoldCloseableResource
>>
>> seems not too bad.  It is a tad wordy, but relatively few people will
>> have to type it, and reading it is pretty clear -- this object may hold
>> a closeable resource.
>>
>> On 6/25/2013 11:14 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>>> These together provide something better than any other related
>>>> schemes I know. I think that if we cam up with stunningly
>>>> good names for these, the plan would be completely uncontroversial.
>>>
>>> MayHoldResource
>>> HoldsResource
>>> MayRequireClosing
>>> ...
>