Serialization opt-in syntax (again)
kevinb at google.com
Mon Oct 1 09:11:49 PDT 2012
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb at google.com> wrote:
And AFAIK, having all lambdas be serializable and having no lambdas be
> serializable are still not considered viable. So we're really in a tough
Actually, given the horrors we're discussing here, let's be sure about
this. If all lambdas were serializable it would be a get out of jail free
card for this design conundrum, so I must ask: are we all satisfied that
we have accurately quantified just *how* bad it would be performance-wise?
If so: how bad?
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lambda-spec-experts