Serialization opt-in syntax (again)

[Kevin Bourrillion]

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb at google.com> wrote:

And AFAIK, having all lambdas be serializable and having no lambdas be
> serializable are still not considered viable. So we're really in a tough
> spot.
>

Actually, given the horrors we're discussing here, let's be sure about
this.  If all lambdas were serializable it would be a get out of jail free
card for this design conundrum, so I must ask:  are we all satisfied that
we have accurately quantified just *how* bad it would be performance-wise?
 If so: how bad?



-- 
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-spec-experts/attachments/20121001/ff83e123/attachment-0001.html