Serialization opt-in syntax (summary)
    Kevin Bourrillion 
    kevinb at google.com
       
    Fri Oct 12 08:46:37 PDT 2012
    
    
  
>
> On 10/12/2012 09:37 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>
>  I keep going back to the rubric of "no worse than inner classes."
>>
>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:17 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com>
 wrote:
And I keep going back to "making the mistake once does not justify making
> it again"...
Ha. I completely see the sense in both of these mindsets.
Posterity hugely prefers that we see it the second way; yet here we are in
the present tense and we have to get something working and deliver it. Is
that the conflict we're having?
-- 
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-spec-experts/attachments/20121012/c701c36b/attachment.html 
    
    
More information about the lambda-spec-experts
mailing list