Transitioning JSR-335 to JCP 2.8 -- EG approval needed
Kevin Bourrillion
kevinb at google.com
Wed Sep 26 13:30:40 PDT 2012
Google says yes.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> The Lmabda JSR was originally submitted in November 2010, under the
> rules of JCP 2.7. When JCP 2.8 (JSR 348) was approved in October 2011
> [1], Oracle publicly committed to convert all in-flight JSRs led by
> Oracle to JCP 2.8.
>
> To convert an in-flight JSR to 2.8 requires the EG members to agree to the
> change. Would each of the JSR-335 EG members as listed on [2] please
> indicate your agreement or disagreement by responding to this message with
> a "Yes" or "No", on-list.
>
>
> [1] https://blogs.oracle.com/**pcurran/entry/no_more_smoke_**filled_rooms<https://blogs.oracle.com/pcurran/entry/no_more_smoke_filled_rooms>
> [2] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/**detail?id=335<http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=335>
>
>
--
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-spec-experts/attachments/20120926/01294c9c/attachment.html
More information about the lambda-spec-experts
mailing list