Part F - Question
daniel.smith at oracle.com
Fri Dec 6 16:33:09 PST 2013
On Dec 6, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Srikanth S Adayapalam <srikanth_sankaran at in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com>
> > Subject: Re: Part F - Question
> > Yes, there's a spec/implementation discrepancy right now. We're
> > discussing internally how we'd like to handle this. (Any comments
> > here are welcome, too, of course.)
> Is there more to this than that it is just a compiler bug that needs to be fixed ?
> ECJ can compile or reject this program based on where I put two lines of code.
> This looks cut and dry - are there any wider ramifications here that I am completely
> overlooking ?
We just wanted to make sure the specification reflected the actually-intended behavior.
After conferring, we've agreed this is a javac bug:
More information about the lambda-spec-experts