Broken link and missing section ?

[Dan Smith]

Pretty much, yes.

I needed to make room for extra sections (for lambdas, method references), and was initially planning to move JLS 7 15.28 to JLS 8 15.30.  Now the plan is to use 15.29.

I added a note explaining the 15.28->15.29 renumbering and fixed the broken link.  Thanks, Srikanth.

—Dan

On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Sam Pullara <sam at sampullara.com> wrote:

> It looks like it meant to reference 15.28 as it does later in the text:
> 
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.28
> 
> Sam
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Srikanth S Adayapalam
> <srikanth_sankaran at in.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Part D: 5. Conversions and contexts:
>> 
>> "Similarly, the rules determining when a target type allows an implicit
>> conversion vary depending on the kind of context, the type of the
>> expression, and, in one special case, the value of a constant expression
>> (15.30). "
>> 
>> The section numbered 15.30 does not appear in JLS7, nor does it seem to
>> occur in 0.6.1 as a search for 15.30 in the one page
>> html form shows only the reference, not the section itself.
>> 
>> Can I get the contents of this section if it is available ?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Srikanth.