[master] RFR: Load Klass* from header in interpreter (x86) [v5]

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.java.net
Tue Oct 12 13:30:29 UTC 2021


On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:23:18 GMT, Roman Kennke <rkennke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/macroAssembler_x86.cpp line 4554:
>> 
>>> 4552:   // NOTE: While it would seem nice to use xorb instead (for which we don't have an encoding in our assembler),
>>> 4553:   // the encoding for xorq uses the signed version (0x81/6) of xor, which encodes as compact as xorb would,
>>> 4554:   // and does't make a difference performance-wise.
>> 
>> I can give you `xorb`, if you want, in a subsequent PR.
>
> I actually have it, locally, but as comment says, it doesn't look any better in terms of code size or performance, so why bother?

OK, fine.

>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/macroAssembler_x86.cpp line 4597:
>> 
>>> 4595:     null_check(src, oopDesc::klass_offset_in_bytes());
>>> 4596:   }
>>> 4597:   movptr(dst, Address(src, oopDesc::klass_offset_in_bytes()));
>> 
>> Do we not need to do any fixups for x86_32?
>
> No because layout-wise, the Klass* remains 4 bytes from object start, and would never get disturbed by anything that happens in the 32-bit-header. Hopefully, when we find a way to avoid displaced headers altogether, we can unify the code with x86_64 and avoid the mess that we make here.

Understood. This bit looks fine then.

>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/templateTable_x86.cpp line 4185:
>> 
>>> 4183:   Register tmp_load_klass = LP64_ONLY(rscratch1) NOT_LP64(noreg);
>>> 4184:   __ load_klass(rdx, rdx, tmp_load_klass, false);
>>> 4185:   __ jmp(resolved);
>> 
>> Have you run into troubles with `jmpb` short branch here?
>
> Yes. The (subsequent) load_klass() increases the distance to resolved.

OK

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/lilliput/pull/15


More information about the lilliput-dev mailing list