[omworld-jdk] Integrated: 8326823: Lilliput: OMWorld: Separate NMT category

[Roman Kennke]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:39:54 GMT, Roman Kennke <rkennke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Currently, the OMWorld table uses mtThread NMT category, which seems very wrong. We could instead add it into the mtObjectMonitor or mtSynchronizer categories, but I think it would be more useful to give the table its own category, for measuring overhead and also compare it to ObjectSynchronizer.
> 
> Example NMT output would look like:
> 
> 
> -           Object Monitors (reserved=1750823568, committed=1750823568)
>                            (malloc=1750823568 #8417421) (peak=1958719776 #9416922)
> -                  OM World (reserved=151456088, committed=151456088)
>                            (malloc=151456088 #8417425) (peak=152173976 #8462293)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 9c09cda0
Author:    Roman Kennke <rkennke at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/commit/9c09cda04e9bbdd0611e0ff567421f68d31821d7
Stats:     4 lines in 2 files changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8326823: Lilliput: OMWorld: Separate NMT category

Reviewed-by: aboldtch

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/pull/141