From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Tue Apr  5 01:46:47 2011
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:46:47 +0900
Subject: [loc-en-dev] Locale enhancement question
In-Reply-To: <4D93E5C6.2000903@oracle.com>
References: <4D93E5C6.2000903@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <4D9AD6F7.6090807@oracle.com>

I'm fixing this problem as 7033504 along with other performance bug reports.

Masayoshi

On 3/31/2011 11:24 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> The attached program produces different results in 6 and 7.
>
> jdk6:
> locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar
>
> jdk7:
> locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
> locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>
> Is this an intentional (therefore approved) change to get different 
> Calendars?
>
> Thanks,
> Masayoshi
>

From y.umaoka at gmail.com  Tue Apr  5 08:16:01 2011
From: y.umaoka at gmail.com (Yoshito Umaoka)
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:16:01 -0400
Subject: [loc-en-dev] Locale enhancement question
In-Reply-To: <4D9AD6F7.6090807@oracle.com>
References: <4D93E5C6.2000903@oracle.com> <4D9AD6F7.6090807@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <4D9B3231.1000008@gmail.com>

Thanks Okutsu-san.

For the issue you mentioned in your earlier message, I think the change 
was not intended.
I know variant field is case sensitive in JDK, but at the same time, I 
think it was a mistake. I have a minor concern because the case 
sensitivity does not work well at ResourceBundle level on platforms like 
Windows. But JDK used to work like that way, I do not see any major 
issues for fixing this.

BTW, I cannot see 7033504. Could you tell me about the "other 
performance bug reports"?

Thanks,
Yoshito

On 4/5/2011 4:46 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> I'm fixing this problem as 7033504 along with other performance bug 
> reports.
>
> Masayoshi
>
> On 3/31/2011 11:24 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
>> The attached program produces different results in 6 and 7.
>>
>> jdk6:
>> locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar
>>
>> jdk7:
>> locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>> locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
>>
>> Is this an intentional (therefore approved) change to get different 
>> Calendars?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Masayoshi
>>