From y.umaoka at gmail.com  Tue Mar  1 15:45:35 2011
From: y.umaoka at gmail.com (Yoshito Umaoka)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:45:35 -0500
Subject: [loc-en-dev] (Bug ID: 7023613) - Incorrect string returned by
 Locale#toString() with non-empty script field
Message-ID: <4D6D851F.1080809@gmail.com>

I've just filed the bug which I mentioned while ago.

-Yoshito

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Your Report (Bug ID: 7023613) - Incorrect string returned by 
Locale#toString() with non-empty script field
Date: 	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:42:53 -0700 (MST)
From: 	IncidentDaemon at sun.com <IncidentDaemon at sun.com>
To: 	y.umaoka at gmail.com



Dear Java Developer,

Thank you for reporting this issue.

We have determined that this report is a new bug and entered the bug into our internal bug tracking system under Bug Id: 7023613.

You can monitor this bug on the Java Bug Database at
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7023613.

It may take a day or two before your bug shows up in this external database.  If you are a member of the Sun Developer Network (SDN), there are two additional options once the bug is visible.

1. Voting for the bug
    Click http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/addVote.do?bug_id=7023613.

2. Adding the report to your Bug Watch list.
    You will receive an email notification when this bug is updated.
    Click http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/addBugWatch.do?bug_id=7023613.

The Sun Developer Network (http://developers.sun.com) is a free service that Sun offers.  To join, visit https://softwarereg.sun.com/registration/developer/en_US/new_user.

Regards,
Java Developer Support


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/locale-enhancement-dev/attachments/20110301/4f079c63/attachment.html 

From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Wed Mar 30 19:24:06 2011
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:24:06 +0900
Subject: [loc-en-dev] Locale enhancement question
Message-ID: <4D93E5C6.2000903@oracle.com>

The attached program produces different results in 6 and 7.

jdk6:
locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
locale=ja_JP_JP, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar
locale=ja_JP_jp, cal=java.util.GregorianCalendar

jdk7:
locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
locale=ja_JP_JP_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar
locale=ja_JP_jp_#u-ca-japanese, cal=java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar

Is this an intentional (therefore approved) change to get different 
Calendars?

Thanks,
Masayoshi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JapaneseCal.java
Type: java/*
Size: 421 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/locale-enhancement-dev/attachments/20110331/8b3ccb94/attachment.bin