slow performance of loom continuations
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Mon Sep 10 08:27:37 UTC 2018
On 09/07/2018 07:42 PM, seth lytle wrote:
>> Could I recommend JMH?
>
> this isn't intended as a benchmark (kilim does have some but i haven't
> looked at them). but this example has been representative of how i use
> kilim
Right, but these days no-one believes performance measurements that don't
use JMH. Rewriting your test in JMH would make it easier to understand
the performance issues, and JMH has excellent tools to analyze and pinpoint
slowdowns.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list