ForkJoinTask[] instances
Dr Heinz M. Kabutz
heinz at javaspecialists.eu
Fri Nov 20 09:33:17 UTC 2020
Good morning from Crete,
I started an experiment 11 days ago with 2 million virtual threads in
one JVM sending ping messages to another 2 million virtual threads in
another JVM. It has been happily humming along. When looking at it this
morning, I noticed in the class histogram that
[Ljava.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask; appeared higher on the list than I
had expected.
On the JVM that has 2 million client threads:
num #instances #bytes class name (module)
-------------------------------------------------------
1: 1999997 1453773944 jdk.internal.misc.StackChunk
(java.base at 16-internal)
2: 7169 1302840336 [Ljava.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask;
(java.base at 16-internal)
On the JVM that has 2 million server threads:
num #instances #bytes class name (module)
-------------------------------------------------------
1: 2000000 820706112 jdk.internal.misc.StackChunk
(java.base at 16-internal)
2: 2000000 304000000 java.lang.VirtualThread
(java.base at 16-internal)
3: 2000000 208000000 java.lang.VirtualThread$1
(java.base at 16-internal)
4: 2000000 160000000 sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl
(java.base at 16-internal)
5: 1999999 143999928
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask
(java.base at 16-internal)
6: 28 134230464 [Ljava.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask;
(java.base at 16-internal)
Has anyone else noticed this?
Regards
Heinz
--
Dr Heinz M. Kabutz (PhD CompSci)
Author of "The Java™ Specialists' Newsletter" - www.javaspecialists.eu
Java Champion - www.javachampions.org
JavaOne Rock Star Speaker
Tel: +30 69 75 595 262
Skype: kabutz
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list