Implementation of concurrency primitives

[Andrey Lomakin]

I see :-)
The current version of my project is using only JDK API, at least the part
which requires syncrhonization.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:30 AM Cristian Lorenzetto <
cristian.lorenzetto at gmail.com> wrote:

> I had a idea similar in the past ... but the problem is many librariies
> (also basic code)  in java is using synchnorized blocks for example....
> My project was , using instrumentation , to remove synchronized code for
> adapting it to fibers ...
>
> Il giorno gio 18 nov 2021 alle ore 08:59 Andrey Lomakin <
> lomakin.andrey at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi Cristian.
>> Sure I would like to use CPU affinity at the end.
>> But my primary concern is memory barriers or more widely thread safety.
>>
>> I mean the following, could I use for example HashMap instead of
>> ConcurrentHashMap in such cases or more widely speaking, could I use data
>> structures that were not designed to be thread-safe because I use
>> cooperative multitasking and know that execution of methods
>> will not be interrupted and in nutshell, all execution is running inside
>> of the single thread, so that is a single-threaded application in nutshell
>> with means to exchange data using threadsafe queues for example.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:16 AM Cristian Lorenzetto <
>> cristian.lorenzetto at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting question, but i suspect it is not possible realize a custom
>>> manager for that but you can use cpu affinity flag
>>>
>>> Il giorno gio 18 nov 2021 alle ore 07:44 Andrey Lomakin <
>>> lomakin.andrey at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Good morning, guys.
>>>>
>>>> I am considering creating an application that will use a
>>>> thread-per-core approach. Data mostly will not be shared between cores
>>>> and
>>>> I am going to use a single thread executor to schedule fibres.
>>>>
>>>> My question is may I use my own concurrency primitives which do not
>>>> inject
>>>> memory barriers unlike the standard concurrency primitives to
>>>> achieve maximum performance and if that is not possible could you
>>>> explain
>>>> why?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Andrey Lomakin.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Andrey Lomakin.
>>
>>

-- 
Best regards,
Andrey Lomakin.