Project Loom VirtualThreads hang
robert engels
rengels at ix.netcom.com
Wed Dec 28 14:17:58 UTC 2022
Btw, in regards to the timings here, this was for the SpinTest.
> On Dec 28, 2022, at 7:07 AM, Robert Engels <rengels at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> I tested with JDK 20 and both the VThreadTest and SpinTest complete successfully using Thread.yield!
>
> Surprisingly, it is slower than using LockSupport.parkNanos(1) - 14 secs vs 7 secs I am not sure this makes sense - as conceptually a thread yield should be at least as efficient as a 0 time sleep - and probably more efficient.
>
>> On Dec 28, 2022, at 6:51 AM, Robert Engels <rengels at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>> You write:
>>
>>> I won't go into detail, but the producers not synchronizing between themselves leads to hangs.
>>
>>
>> Can you explain? Im fairly certain the producers do valid synchronization. As I said, using native threads the code runs to completion fine
>>
>> Now that I understand the issue I was able to reproduce the issue very simply without any queues. See SpinTest posted to the project. The “starver” thread fails to make any progress - this should not be possible is Thread.yield() was fair.
>>
>>> On Dec 27, 2022, at 11:15 PM, Alex Otenko <oleksandr.otenko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I won't go into detail, but the producers not synchronizing between themselves leads to hangs.
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list