Virtual thread overhead in SharedRuntime::handle_wrong_method
Gillespie, Oli
ogillesp at amazon.co.uk
Mon Aug 21 09:18:14 UTC 2023
Hi,
I've been using virtual threads and I noticed some apparently significant overhead in SharedRuntime::handle_wrong_method.
A simple 'benchmark'/stress test profiled with async-profiler shows (among other similar stacks):
```
--- 29055613704 ns (21.14%), 288804 samples
[ 0] ImmutableOopMap::update_register_map(frame const*, RegisterMap*) const
[ 1] vframeStream::vframeStream(JavaThread*, bool, bool, bool)
[ 2] SharedRuntime::find_callee_method(JavaThread*)
[ 3] SharedRuntime::reresolve_call_site(JavaThread*)
[ 4] SharedRuntime::handle_wrong_method(JavaThread*)
[ 5] jdk.internal.vm.Continuation.enterSpecial
[ 6] jdk.internal.vm.Continuation.run
[ 7] java.lang.VirtualThread.runContinuation
[ 8] java.lang.VirtualThread$$Lambda.0x00007ffad006e3d8.run
[ 9] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec
[10] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec
[11] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec
[12] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan
[13] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker
[14] java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run
```
Is this just the expected path+cost of swapping between virtual threads, or is there something surprising happening here?
My code for the test is:
```
import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class Virt {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
while (true) {
ExecutorService e = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor();
for (int i = 0; i < 100_000; i++) e.submit(Main::task);
e.shutdown(); e.awaitTermination(100, TimeUnit.MINUTES);
}
}
static void task() { }
}
```
Notes:
- I'm running with JDK21, using `java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-DoJVMTIVirtualThreadTransitions Virt.java` since I know async-profiler as a JVMTI agent triggers some other overheads which would be distracting in the profiling data.
- Another user saw similar behaviour in https://github.com/async-profiler/async-profiler/issues/779#issuecomment-1651225252.
Apologies if this is just totally expected behaviour, but I couldn't find any discussion on it.
Regards,
Oli
Amazon Development Centre (London) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales with registration number 04543232 with its registered office at 1 Principal Place, Worship Street, London EC2A 2FA, United Kingdom.
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list