Performance Questions and Poller Implementation in Project Loom
Ilya Starchenko
st.ilya.101 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 1 20:22:46 UTC 2023
On 1 Nov 2023 at 01:51:44, Francesco Nigro <nigro.fra at gmail.com> wrote:
> Techempower plaintext is highly pipelined (in the worst way, because is
> http 1.1 and NOT http 2, which is designed for that) and CPU bound, due to
> http encoding/decoding, especially if the framework is a "proper" one (see
> my rant at
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/discussions/7984) and
> materialize properly the headers; which means that an improvement in that
> part can be the responsible to achieve better numbers in techempower
Franz,
Thank you for the clarification. I've already noticed that some of the
Techempower benchmarks don't accurately represent real-world scenarios, but
I haven't found another benchmark that would be more representative. I'll
try profiling and perhaps look for alternative benchmarks (I've heard that
the Quarkus team is working on some benchmarks).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/attachments/20231101/04bfa9f8/attachment.htm>
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list