java.lang.ThreadBuilders and java.lang.ThreadBuilders.newVirtualThread() are not public
Rick Hendricksen
Rick.Hendricksen at vanderlande.com
Wed Aug 21 15:09:49 UTC 2024
I wasn’t aware of that blocker object, thanks! And yes, it would be very useful if that was available to the scheduler.
- Rick
From: Alan Bateman <alan.bateman at oracle.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2024 16:48
To: Rick Hendricksen <Rick.Hendricksen at vanderlande.com>; loom-dev at openjdk.org
Cc: Dennis van den Berg <Dennis.van.den.Berg at vanderlande.com>
Subject: Re: java.lang.ThreadBuilders and java.lang.ThreadBuilders.newVirtualThread() are not public
Be aware: This email was created outside of Vanderlande. Be cautious of its contents and do not click any links or attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
On 21/08/2024 15:31, Rick Hendricksen wrote:
Yeah, LockSupport.park(). But that’s used by other things in the JVM too, right?
The no-arg park doesn't set the park blocker, park(Object) does. I was just trying to understand which you are you using.
-Alan
________________________________
** Disclaimer **
This e-mail, including any attachments, may include proprietary and confidential information of Vanderlande and may only be read by the person or those persons to whom it is addressed.
This document is forwarded to you in such a form (e-mail) that Vanderlande cannot guarantee the completeness and/or correctness of its contents and information.
If you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify us immediately.
Please also delete this document from your computer.
This document may not be reproduced, copied, distributed, published, modified, or furnished to third parties, without the prior written consent of Vanderlande.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/attachments/20240821/cde76f9b/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list