[External] : Re: Virtual thread memory leak because TrackingRootContainer keeps threads

Brian S O'Neill bronee at gmail.com
Thu Jul 4 20:34:05 UTC 2024


On 2024-07-04 11:43 AM, Ron Pressler wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 3 Jul 2024, at 18:27, robert engels <rengels at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree 100% - I am fighting that the auto-closing of the queues, clean-up, etc is “unneeded magic”
> 
> There is no auto-closing, no cleanup, and no magic. If a thread gets stuck in a state where it can never be observed or continued — so if it is NOT waiting on a queue to which something could be enqueued because in that case the thread COULD possibly continue — then whether that thread consumes some inaccessible bytes in memory or not is the same as far as functionality is concerned.
> 

What about the case that that freeing a forever-stuck VT allows more 
objects to be freed, which then might have cleaning actions? Freeing the 
stuck VT could create a side effect that would have only occurred when 
it resumed somehow.


More information about the loom-dev mailing list