Synchronized methods and virtual threads

[Andrew Haley]

On 6/4/24 09:56, Alex Otenko wrote:
> I think it is not about performance, but language support of correctness.
> 
> So to speak, the language provides statements to build programs that are obviously sequentially consistent. (With the caveat that deadlocks probably are evidence of the execution that is not sequentially consistent)

What are you replying to?

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671