ScopedValue.runWhere not returning scope
Marcin Grzejszczak
marcin.grzejszczak at gmail.com
Fri Jun 21 08:11:39 UTC 2024
> Who did you think you'd been talking to?
I'm sorry, but you don't have to be unpleasant.
I thought that this mailing list should be used for exactly the reason
related to giving feedback on preview features such as scoped values. I
understand that this thread is extremely long but the problem is complex in
my opinion. If you're unwilling to continue this discussion of get feedback
about the features you're working on then just say so.
Afair some people in this thread stated that they are not working on the
JDK. Some, like you, if I'm not mistaken, have not addressed most of my
arguments. I've only heard that for security reasons (scopes could be
opened and closed out of order) and immutability (I don't understand how
the api changes would modify that. It simply allows me to have more
control. What currently is called in the lambda would be manually called by
me. There are no changes here unless I'm mistaken) you are reluctant to
consider my feedback.
You have all right to do that, I don't have a problem with that, but I'd
just prefer to have a final, definite answer so that I can plan changes in
tracing libraries accordingly.
Pozdrawiam / Best regards,
Marcin Grzejszczak
https://marcin.grzejszczak.pl
https://toomuchcoding.com
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 09:57, Andrew Haley <aph-open at littlepinkcloud.com>
wrote:
> On 6/20/24 13:42, Marcin Grzejszczak wrote:
> >
> > I still would like to get the answer from the JDK maintainers if my
> arguments (which I think I presented a lot) would allow it to consider
> opening the API to the idea of giving the library maintainers more control.
>
> Who did you think you'd been talking to?
>
> On 6/20/24 14:57, Robert Engels wrote:
> >
> > If there is any performance gain, it is due to the property of them
> being immutable and shared - something your api changes are trying to
> discard
>
> Yes. This.
>
> --
> Andrew Haley (he/him)
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/attachments/20240621/1c64e31b/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list