JEP 491 Backport

[Andrew Haley]

On 11/11/24 22:25, Brandon Burchett wrote:
> While I agree with all of that, I don't think the unnecessary pinning of virtual threads should be considered a "stable" behavior, and if anything, cause more harm than good, especially since virtual threads were /the highlight/ of JDK 21.

Speaking as a maintainer of JDK 21, and a part-author of the JEP 491
implementation, I think it would be a risky backport.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671