Feedback about structured Concurrency and proposing of a new functional interface akin runnable
Alan Bateman
alan.bateman at oracle.com
Fri Sep 5 11:09:57 UTC 2025
On 04/09/2025 04:15, david Grajales wrote:
> :
>
> One thing I noticed is that having to declare |Void| and return |null|
> introduces a bit of noise. This ceremony is required because
> |Runnable| doesn’t allow checked exceptions in its contract (and never
> will, for backwards compatibility). Yet, in practice, many real-world
> tasks don’t return values directly — instead, they write to or consume
> from buffers.
>
> This makes the |Void| return type and |return null| feel redundant. I
> was wondering: would it be worth considering the addition of a
> |Runnable|-like functional interface that permits checked exceptions?
>
Runnable and Callable are familiar to all of APIs in this area. We've
avoided introducing throwing-Runnable or throwing-Supplier functional
interfaces as adding any throwing interface to j.u.function opens the
door to requests to add more. It might also be that someday there are
changes to the language for exception transparency or maybe allowing
overriding with an unboxed return. So maybe in the future need for such
interfaces may go away (I can't speak to any specific plans of course,
instead just saying that we've been conservative about adding throwing
variants that could potentially be obsolete in the future).
-Alan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/attachments/20250905/f7b2599e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the loom-dev
mailing list