<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">Sadly, Helidon doesn’t support websocket so. Kind of limits it’s use for many applications. </div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Nov 1, 2023, at 5:30 PM, Robert Engels <rengels@ix.netcom.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">I reviewed the benchmarks as well. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Something smells fishy - and the design is suspect. There should be a standardized client that enforcers all required behavior and provides randomization of requests. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Otherwise the benchmarks don’t come close to the real world. </div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Nov 1, 2023, at 3:23 PM, Ilya Starchenko <st.ilya.101@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On 1 Nov 2023 at 01:51:44, Francesco Nigro <<a href="mailto:nigro.fra@gmail.com">nigro.fra@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(155,155,155)!important;padding-left:1ex;color:rgb(155,155,155)!important" type="cite">
Techempower plaintext is highly pipelined (in the worst way, because is http 1.1 and NOT http 2, which is designed for that) and CPU bound, due to http encoding/decoding, especially if the framework is a "proper" one (see my rant at <a href="https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/discussions/7984">https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/discussions/7984</a>) and materialize properly the headers; which means that an improvement in that part can be the responsible to achieve better numbers in techempower
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<p style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";font-size-adjust:none;font-kerning:auto;font-variant-alternates:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-feature-settings:normal">Franz,</p>
<p style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";font-size-adjust:none;font-kerning:auto;font-variant-alternates:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-feature-settings:normal;min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p style="margin:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:"Helvetica Neue";font-size-adjust:none;font-kerning:auto;font-variant-alternates:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-feature-settings:normal">Thank you for the clarification. I've already noticed that some of the Techempower benchmarks don't accurately represent real-world scenarios, but I haven't found another benchmark that would be more representative. I'll try profiling and perhaps look for alternative benchmarks (I've heard that the Quarkus team is working on some benchmarks).</p>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></body></html>