<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:32 PM Viktor Klang <<a href="mailto:viktor.klang@oracle.com">viktor.klang@oracle.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><div>> Thanks for your thoughts!</div><div><br></div><div>Happy to help :-)</div><div><br>> As you can imagine, we have performed numerous experiments with different naming structures and themes, and the current selection came out as the winner.<br><br>Sure. Just remember that sometimes being an expert makes it very hard to see the world like a new user does. Anchoring and Curse of Knowledge is real. The first-use, fresh-eye experience happens just once, my feedback here comes from that viewpoint.</div><div><br></div><div>While today is my first time sitting down actually coding with this feature, I did watch some presentations in the past (by Alan, IIRC). My thought seeing those was "This API seems raw, like work in progress, naming will probably converge / settle on something simpler once the myopticy of the first rounds of experimentation and implementation is over". Seeing that didn't seem to happen, I sat down to code with a goal to find some actual inherent complexity warranting the current naming. So far I've had no luck. But fine, I guess we can always disagree on naming. It should be easy enough to user test this on non-expert users, but yeah it's work..<br> <br>> Besides the naming, do you have more feedback on the feature itself?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-6447842378971660755"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></div><div>Probably, I need some more exploration time first.</div><div><br></div><div>Eirik.</div></div>