LLVM vs stock GCC

[Julien Ponge]

Makes sense.

-- 
Julien Ponge

On lundi 18 avril 2011 at 22:21, Gary Meyer wrote: 
> There's nothing wrong with Henri's tests. making any conclusions about OpenJDK-macosx-port isn't really fair since it isn't anywhere near finished (or even functional, really). We have to get it to work before we will make it fast.
> Gary.
> =======================
> Gary Meyer
> Java Software Build Engineer
> gary.meyer at apple.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Julien Ponge wrote:
> > What's wrong in Henri's tests?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Julien Ponge
> > 
> > On lundi 18 avril 2011 at 22:03, Gary Meyer wrote:
> > > no, llvm is actually faster … to a certain extent you are comparing apple to oranges
> > > =======================
> > > Gary Meyer
> > > Java Software Build Engineer
> > > gary.meyer at apple.com
> > > 
> > > On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi to all,
> > > > 
> > > > I do some benchmarks with various JVMs available on OS/X
> > > > (http://blog.hgomez.net/2011/04/18/apple-jdk’s-openjdks-–-core2duo-vs-core-i7/)
> > > > 
> > > > Apple VM (1.6.0-22/1.6.0-24), OpenJDK 6, OpenJDK 7 from bsd-port and
> > > > OpenJDK 7 from macosx-port.
> > > > 
> > > > I notice a small performance loss in macosx-port version, which is
> > > > similar to bsd-port code base, except it's using LLVM.
> > > > 
> > > > Did there is a penalty using LLVM instead of stock GCC ?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > 
> > 
>