should this happen? java.lang.System.getProperty("os.arch") => 'universal'
Henri Gomez
henri.gomez at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 02:57:36 PDT 2011
Oups, http://java.net/jira/browse/MACOSX_PORT-39 (not 38)
2011/4/29 Henri Gomez <henri.gomez at gmail.com>:
> I was discuss previously, only 'releases' build tag them correctly.
>
> See also http://java.net/jira/browse/MACOSX_PORT-37 and
> http://java.net/jira/browse/MACOSX_PORT-38
> And also this one, http://java.net/jira/browse/MACOSX_PORT-19
>
> And of course vote for your favorites issues
>
> 2011/4/29 Michael Hall <mik3hall at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Harald Kuhr wrote:
>>
>>> While we're at it, "os.name" reports "Darwin" and "os.version" reports "10.7.0" which is also wrong (at least on my Snow Leopard system).
>>>
>>> openjdk version "1.7.0-internal"
>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-internal-b00)
>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b07, mixed mode)
>>
>> I guess additionally while we're at it. If -version showed the correct b## build at some point it would be nice. I was talking with someone else about the possibility of version being involved in something. They were on a Windows b120 ea release. I believe the actual latest release now is around b139? I showed the above for -version and wasn't really sure what build release it was. Fortunately, I didn't really think whatever it was we were discussing was release related.
>
More information about the macosx-port-dev
mailing list