Application memory use

[Michael Hall]

On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:

> 2012/4/23 Michael Hall <mik3hall at gmail.com>:
>> 
>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:08 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -XX:+UseCompressedOop is activated by default on 23 and post release
>> 
>> Right.
>> So unless I could fallback to an earlier Apple release or you or someone somewhere else has a true universal 32/64 openjdk build still available there is no way to compare a running application for memory differences due to the presence or absence of the compressed option.
> 
> I'm studing on bringing back 32/64 (universal) OpenJDK 7 fo


If I'm understanding correctly this would mean by default compressed would be used for both and you should see more or less the same memory footprint. I'll check when a 32/64 bit openjdk jvm build is available that should match on this option.