RFR: 7141675 Fix jcheck issues in .m sources
Leonid Romanov
leonid.romanov at oracle.com
Wed Feb 1 08:01:20 PST 2012
Btw, how does one strip trailing whitespaces/empty lines in XCode?
On 01.02.2012, at 19:17, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> That will be a problem. If jcheck is changed in such a way that
> an already committed changeset would be rejected, then it has
> to be added to the whitelist. Otherwise, a fresh clone will fail
> when jcheck processes the now offending changeset...
>
> Yes, this implies that jcheck has a scaling problem. As more
> changesets are added to a repo, the more work jcheck has to
> do... eventually all compute cycles will be consumed by
> jcheck... :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 2/1/12 7:44 AM, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Yes, that could be a problem. I think they will have to be added to the whitelist.
>>
>> - Michael
>>
>> On 01/02/12 13:32, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if jcheck is updated to include these .m files, will it reject the old changesets where the .m files contain trailing whitespaces? Or, should those changesets be added into the whitelist?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Max
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/01/2012 08:25 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> The patch looks fine to me. It would be great to update jcheck as well
>>>> so that the formatting requirements be enforced for further putbacks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> best regards,
>>>> Anthony
>>>>
>>>> On 2/1/2012 3:56 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>>> This change is just to fix some white-space/tab problems that crept into
>>>>> some objective C files whose filename (extension .m) is not currently
>>>>> known to jcheck.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7141675/webrev.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> There is nothing to see in the webrev as white-space diferences are
>>>>> ignored.
>>>>> But the patch shows the actual changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Michael.
>>
More information about the macosx-port-dev
mailing list