Java 7 for Mac OSX

Henri Gomez henri.gomez at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 01:54:45 PST 2012


2012/2/19 Mike Swingler <swingler at apple.com>:
> On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
>
>> We hope to ship 7u4 native libraries as universal binaries containing only
>> 64-bit code instead of pure 64-bit binaries
>
>
> I don't understand the distinction here: there is no such thing as a "pure 64-bit binary" that is different from a "universal binary containing only 64-bit" on Mac OS X. The Mach-o file format always specifies the architecture of the executable text, and it has always had the accommodation for multiple architectures even back to the NeXT days.
>
> Please don't use the "universal" terminology, unless you are actually referring to a binary with more than one architecture. Often it is easier to just refer to either 32 or 64-bit, implying Intel-only, since "universal" is a bit of a marketing term which was introduced during the PPC to Intel transition.

Let's go back to 32/64 bits support on JDK7.
Support for 32bits has been removed some weeks ago (from macosx-port
to jdk7u-osx and now jdk7u).


More information about the macosx-port-dev mailing list