Shortcut Icon blurry

[Jeff Palmer]

Update, tried another similarly signed JWS app, but this one does not need any local permissions.  The short cut of this one relaunches application fine.

Bug file as: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7168761

On May 14, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Jeff Palmer wrote:

> This is related to short cuts being fully operational.  Last week on a Apple forum thread Scott Kovatch said "Shortcut support is now in the build and should show up in next week's EA release".  
> 
> Build 9 came out at the same time he said that, and it does ask to save a short cut. It is just a little too vague what the difference between what a build and a release is.  Staring closely at that statement again though, it implies whatever this thing was last week, full support should be there.
> 
> FYI, as far as Redirected I/O, I agree it works.  With JWS there is a brief period before the JVM is actually running.  Since the redirection occurs so early in the application, I was using it to guess if the process got as far as starting the JVM.
> 
> I just deleted the application from the cache, which also removed the short-cut.  Re-downloaded with safari, and checked the "Always trust" thing this time.  Subsequent clicks of the short cut do not do anything more than before, so that was not the problem.  Guess I have another bug to file.
> 
> 
> On May 14, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On May 14, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Palmer wrote:
>> 
>>> Very early in program sys out & sys err are redirected to file, but noticed no entries in files & mod times old.  Do not think made it all the way to running.  Is this supposed to work yet?
>> 
>> I'm not sure what is what supposed to work yet?
>> Redirected I/O definitely does. My app has done that from initial set up with Java 7.
>> I'm not sure if that's supposed to work differently for some reason JWS?
>> If you figure security is failing you when it shouldn't with JWS then shouldn't there be some exception be thrown or aren't there options to track failures for security reasons? I seem to remember there were but would have to look it up.
>