System properties
Michael Hall
mik3hall at gmail.com
Mon May 21 14:21:52 PDT 2012
On May 21, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Scott Kovatch wrote:
> On May 21, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 2012, at 7:50 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
>>
>>> On May 20, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>>> The USASCII change in particular is going to cause spectacular breakage. Switching the UTF16 endianness is probably going to trip up non BOM using code too.
>>>
>>> I had just been looking at some native in working with OSType's. It used MacRoman in converting. I didn't think it should of. I remembered that MacRoman had been the java file.encoding and wondered if it still was. I have no idea myself what impact changing would have but thought the issue worth raising.
>>
>> What I don't understand is why the encoding is US-ASCII instead of UTF-8. We should definitely not be trying to resurrect MacRoman, because the rest of OS X has basically moved on to UTF-8 or UTF-16.
>>
>> Anyone know why US-ASCII? This is probably worth a bug.
>
> I thought this looked fishy, too. I would have expected UTF-8 for file names, and the default format of text files.
>
> Please file a bug.
I can certainly file a bug report.
To the more general question. Differences in System properties are then to be considered the Oracle/openjdk jvm changing to more current or more general options and are not a concern? Or it is reasonable to ask about them on a case by case basis?
More information about the macosx-port-dev
mailing list