reducing size of bundled jre

Kustaa Nyholm Kustaa.Nyholm at planmeca.com
Mon Jan 7 06:19:27 PST 2013



On Jan 7, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Kustaa Nyholm <Kustaa.Nyholm at planmeca.com<mailto:Kustaa.Nyholm at planmeca.com>> wrote:

Still, we could all do with a lot less!

You mean something like this in Java 8?

http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/161

>From a quick look at that I could envision that all I ever want to write
could  live with 'compact1' profile, any idea how much smaller that would be?

Or the much delayed Jigsaw in Java 9 (hopefully)?

http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/

>From a quick look it is not clear what this amounts to,
basically my small requirements are what most
desktop applications would require and thus
a 'desktop profile' might be easier than managing
modules one by one, on the otherhand, this might
not be much more work and could be more compact.

br Kusti




More information about the macosx-port-dev mailing list