xawt??

[Anthony Petrov]

Hi Phil,

Is it 8005491 what you're looking for?

--
best regards,
Anthony

On 05/16/2013 09:23 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 10:04 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>
>> On 5/16/2013 8:57 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>>> Artem,
>>>
>>> Is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8001338
>>> [macosx] -Dawt.toolkit=sun.awt.X11.XToolkit option does not work
>>>
>>> considered to be the right bug to track this, since the last comment is
>>>
>>> "I think that we should not support XToolkit on Mac OS X." ?
>>
>> No, it's a separate issue. As written in the bug comments, XToolkit
>> works on OS X in general, it just doesn't start if only awt.toolkit is
>> specified. If, in addition to awt.toolkit, you also specify the right
>> java.awt.graphicsenv, it will launch.
>>
>> The comment is correct, but it doesn't say anything about what JDK
>> version XToolkit should not be supported in :) As I wrote in the
>> previous email, my vote is JDK8.
>
> Artem,
>
> I know that. What I am asking is what is the bug id used to track the
> build change ?
> I spent a while searching and that's the closest match I found.
>
> -phil.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Artem
>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 5/16/2013 8:58 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/16/2013 7:36 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I found about four issues pertaining to this particular problem
>>>>> (including the one I'm working on). I think ideally, it should be a
>>>>> configure switch so if someone wants to build it then they can, but
>>>>> for production purposes it should be off.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was hoping to fix jawt_md.h for 7u40 though...
>>>>
>>>> Such a change as removing XAWT should be done in major releases. When
>>>> a component becomes obsolete, it is first made non-default, then
>>>> deprecated in the next major release, then removed in the next next
>>>> major release. This is what we did for MToolkit, for example.
>>>>
>>>> So let us get rid of XAWT in JDK8, not 7uX.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Artem
>>>>
>>>>> -DrD-
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, David.
>>>>>> Yes there is a bug on it for jdk8. The reason why it is exists, is
>>>>>> used for comparing of a rendering of aqua/xawt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16.05.2013 3:12, David DeHaven wrote:
>>>>>>> Is there any particular reason xawt (and awt/X11) is being built on
>>>>>>> Mac?
>>>>>>> Is anyone actually using it or is this just some vestige of the
>>>>>>> initial port that wasn't shut off?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To me it just looks like a whole mass of dead code wasting space in
>>>>>>> the JRE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More importantly, it's getting in the way of fixing the Mac OS X
>>>>>>> jawt_md.h so it's actually usable...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -DrD-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>