Question about JDK-8024281 Mac OS X: stop relying on Apple's JavaVM Frameworks
Michael Hall
mik3hall at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 14:33:36 UTC 2015
Probably David should answer, but I think the short answer is yes.
I tried to track down discussion of the issues I had during the port. For some background discussion on a longer answer…
http://grokbase.com/t/openjdk/core-libs-dev/123vsxhkm9/rfr-7134701-macosx-support-legacy-native-library-names
http://webmail.dev411.com/t/openjdk/macosx-port-dev/1241wanbck/rfr-7134701-macosx-support-legacy-native-library-names
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-February/003031.html
Although I didn’t find any specific reference to the bug report I had. I also didn’t think jnilib was that Apple specific. But the discussions seem to have it that way.
I think for now dylib would probably just be much preferred?
Michael Hall
trz nio.2 for OS X http://www195.pair.com/mik3hall/index.html#trz
HalfPipe Java 6/7 shell app http://www195.pair.com/mik3hall/index.html#halfpipe
AppConverter convert Apple jvm to openjdk apps http://www195.pair.com/mik3hall/index.html#appconverter
More information about the macosx-port-dev
mailing list