Trying to work newer indy into JRuby
Charles Oliver Nutter
charles.nutter at sun.com
Tue May 19 14:17:44 PDT 2009
Rémi Forax wrote:
> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic
> bytecode change.
> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a
> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC.
No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update.
I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode
level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon?
- Charlie
More information about the mlvm-dev
mailing list