Trying to work newer indy into JRuby

Charles Oliver Nutter charles.nutter at sun.com
Tue May 19 14:17:44 PDT 2009


Rémi Forax wrote:
> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic 
> bytecode change.
> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a 
> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC.

No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update.

I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode 
level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon?

- Charlie



More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list