coroutine support

[Charles Oliver Nutter]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:46 PM, John Rose <John.Rose at sun.com> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>
>> I'm going to try callcc alone against bsd-port head.
>
> Yes; don't build indy into it; it's too much of a moving target to integrate with callcc etc.

Ok, I got this far into the build:

DARWIN_C_SOURCE -c -o activationFrameKlass.o
/Users/headius/projects/davinci/sources/hotspot/src/share/vm/oops/activationFrameKlass.cpp
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
/Users/headius/projects/davinci/sources/hotspot/src/share/vm/oops/activationFrameKlass.cpp:
In member function 'int
activationFrameKlass::do_oop_internal(oopDesc*, OopClosure&)':
/Users/headius/projects/davinci/sources/hotspot/src/share/vm/oops/activationFrameKlass.cpp:106:
warning: taking address of temporary
make[7]: *** [activationFrameKlass.o] Error 1
make[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[6]: *** [the_vm] Error 2
make[5]: *** [fastdebug] Error 2
make[4]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[3]: *** [fastdebug] Error 2
make[2]: *** [hotspot-build] Error 2
make[1]: *** [generic_debug_build] Error 2
make: *** [build_fastdebug_image] Error 2

This was against the revision the patch repo is synced to, so I'm
going to try to build against bsd-port head now.

Lukas: What revision of bsd-port should I be trying to apply/build this against?

- Charlie