still no fun with invokedynamic

Jochen Theodorou blackdrag at gmx.org
Fri Sep 11 02:36:36 PDT 2009


Rémi Forax schrieb:
> Le 11/09/2009 03:08, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
>>    
>>> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
>>> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
>>> invokedynamic work.
>>>      
>> well I wanted to run an optimized Groovy against
>> Methodhandles+invokedynamic and comparing both in the interpreted mode
>> will not help much here. If I run normal Groovy with the server hotspot
>> against the program with interpreter mode, the other one has no chance
>> of winning.
>>    
> You can also try the backport :)
> http://code.google.com/p/jvm-language-runtime/source/browse/#svn/trunk/invokedynamic-backport

well, I will most probably do, since there is nothing else and the VM 
implementation is hopefully faster than or of equal speed. In 
functionality I trust your backport very much ;)

bye Jochen

-- 
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org)
http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/



More information about the mlvm-dev mailing list