still no fun with invokedynamic
Jochen Theodorou
blackdrag at gmx.org
Fri Sep 11 02:36:36 PDT 2009
Rémi Forax schrieb:
> Le 11/09/2009 03:08, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
>>
>>> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
>>> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
>>> invokedynamic work.
>>>
>> well I wanted to run an optimized Groovy against
>> Methodhandles+invokedynamic and comparing both in the interpreted mode
>> will not help much here. If I run normal Groovy with the server hotspot
>> against the program with interpreter mode, the other one has no chance
>> of winning.
>>
> You can also try the backport :)
> http://code.google.com/p/jvm-language-runtime/source/browse/#svn/trunk/invokedynamic-backport
well, I will most probably do, since there is nothing else and the VM
implementation is hopefully faster than or of equal speed. In
functionality I trust your backport very much ;)
bye Jochen
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org)
http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
More information about the mlvm-dev
mailing list