Test cases related to JSR 292

[Rémi Forax]

>> This is a possibility, hoping that the entry ticket to the ASM API is not to high.
>>
>> While developing the code to read/write a JDK7 class file, I noticed what I think
>> is a typo on the "http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/package-summary.html"
>> page. The line:
>> 	u1 reference_kind;       // 1..8 (one of REF_invokeVirtual, etc.)
>> should probably be:
>> 	u1 reference_kind;       // 1..9 (one of REF_invokeVirtual, etc.)
>> unless interface methods are explicitly forbidden. In the latter case, what is
>> the motive?
> Sorry for the noise, but I have another question regarding the aforementioned URL
> that I use as a specification for JSR 292. It is not clear which elements can embed
> a "BootstrapMethods" attribute, possible candidates being, at first sight:
>    - a "Code" attribute;
>    - a method;
>    - a class.
>
> My first move would be to regard this attribute as reserved to a "Code" attribute,
> but it seems that data sharing would be increased by putting it a the class level.

The BootstrapMethods attribute is a class attribute.
And you're right that this is not written anywhere :(
We should fix that too.

> Thanks for any insight.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Xavier

regards,
Rémi