ValueConversion.unbox* fixes(?)

[Christian Thalinger]

On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Le 12/11/2010 12:26, Christian Thalinger a écrit :
>>> As I have already said, I'm not expert here but these changes let all
>>> tests of this testcase pass:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6998541/webrev.00/test/compiler/6998541/Test6998541.java.html
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure if the assumption is correct that every non-zero
>>> primitive value is a boolean true.
>>> 
>>> John, Remi, I'd like your opinion on that.
>>> 
>>> -- Christian
>> 
>> Christian,
>> methods unboxRaw call unbox versions, so you have also changed
>> the semantics of all methods unboxRaw which seems a bad idea.
> 
> 
> Yeah, I'm also a bit worried about that.  I think I leave that up to  
> John to fix it properly.

John, is that actually a bug?  -- Christian