need little help for class loading & invokeDynamics

[Marvin Hansen]

Thansk you Rene,

visibility is not an issue, since both class & method are declared
public and a normal static call works just fine. I'm sorry
I've forgotten to add the simpleMath source but for the sake of
completeness I've copied the class
at the bottom of the mail.

However, it looks much more that I've run into the problem that java
cannot directly emit invokedynamic.
I understant that the main purpose for invokedynamic was and still is
the support of dynamic languages but
this limitation seams arbitrary for me. Is there any intention to
change it or is that the way invokedynamic should
be released?

Anyway, thanks for the link I will read it carefully and hopefully I
will find a work-around to do an
invokedynamic call from my loaded class.

Thanks for your helpful advice;





public class SimpleMath {

    public SimpleMath() {
    }

    /**
     * @param a
     * @param b
     * @param op
     * @return int
     */
    public int run(int a, int b, String op) {

        int returnvalue = calculate(a, b, op);

        return returnvalue;
    }


    private int calculate(int a, int b, String op) {

        int ret = null;

            switch (op) {
                case "+":
                    ret = a + b;
                    break;
                case "-":
                    ret = a - b;
                    break;
                case "/":
                    ret = a / b;
                    break;
                case "*":
                    ret = a * b;
                    break;
                default:
                    System.err.println("No valid paramter given. Use
only :  '+' ; '-' ; '/' ; '*' (String)
                                                  as operator and
interger as numbers");
                    break;
            }
}



http://www.marvin-hansen.tel




On 14 January 2011 21:04, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> On 01/14/2011 06:15 AM, Marvin Hansen wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I've started to work on invokeDynamics but I need a little help to
>> understand how to use it right. For learning purpose, I've written a
>> little class, that loads another class, does the method look-up and
>> (should) execute the located method. The example in the methodHandle
>> JavaDoc was my starting point but as usual it's not that easy since it
>> works well for JDK classes but not with loading my own class which
>> causes a “NoAccessException”.
>>
>> I suppose that I need to deal with CallSite&  Bootstraping but I've
>> not yet figured out how to patch class-loading, methodHandle,
>> Bootstraping&  invocation together in order to make it work. The
>> JavaDoc says, that before an invokedynamic instruction can be executed
>> a CallSite must be linked  via boostrap method that produces a
>> methodHandle. That makes sense for me.
>>
>> However, the CallSite JavaDoc is a little bit short on illustrating
>> how to use it together with class-loading.
>> The given example bootstrap Method:
>>
>> private static CallSite bootstrapDynamic(MethodHandles.Lookup caller,
>> String name, MethodType type) {
>>    // ignore caller and name, but match the type:
>>    return new ConstantCallSite(MethodHandles.collectArguments(printArgs, type));
>> }
>>
>> looks fine but this method is neither used nor linked or registered
>> in the sample code of the JavaDoc so here are my related questions:
>>
>> 1) What is needed in a bootstrap method to produce a working callSite
>> for a loaded class?
>>
>> 2) How is the bootstrap method linked to  an invokedynamic instruction?
>> The spec does not have the @BootstrapMethod anymore so what's the
>> current way of linking?
>
> The bootstrap method is know encoded as argument of the invokedynamic
> instruction.
> So each invokedynamic can have its own bootstrap method.
>
> The main problem is that there is no way currently to emit an
> invokedynamic in Java,
> see
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2011/01/07/call-invokedynamic-java
>
>> 3) Should the class-loading be done by the bootstrap method or  is it
>> fine to do it before?
>
> Fine to do it before.
>
>>
>> I really appriciate any input, since I'm new to InvokeDynamics and not
>> familiar with all concepts.
>>
>> marvin
>
> Rémi
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>