Arg ordering on the test path method handle for GwT

[Mark Roos]

Thanks Kirill

My plan is to use invokeExact so this matches my use case.

mark
> >
> > My question had to do with run time overhead. Do you think that
> > invokeGeneric
> > is slower than invokeEaxct at run time? If not then that removes one 
of the
> > reasons for not using java classes.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> The current invokeGeneric argument conversion implementation has poor 
> performance profile. In jdk7 b124 invokeGeneric() can be 50 times or 
> more slower than invokeExact() or invokeGeneric() with exactly matching 
> signature.
> 
> As far as I know, John hopes to address this problem before JDK7 FCS.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kirill
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20110116/1b3e1ea6/attachment.html