the fate of java.dyn

[Charles Oliver Nutter]

Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Ben Evans
<benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com> wrote:
> I say get rid of vestigial packages / names as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> OpenJDK b135 has JVM support for the new package name java.dyn.invoke, and
>> therefore the new API names can be used with a b135 JVM plus a suitable
>> -Xbootclasspath patch.  In b136 or b137 the JDK changes will follow, so it
>> will work "out of the box".
>>
>> Here's my question:  Does anybody care if we delete JVM support for
>> java.dyn in the very next OpenJDK build?  That's what we'd prefer to do.
>>
>> -- John
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
>